Collo vs McDo

Institutions

The European Court of Human Rights

The court of the Council of Europe, in Strasbourg. It does not retry the case and does not set aside any national decision: it finds a violation of the Convention.

In brief

  • Established by the European Convention on Human Rights, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950. Court set up in 1959.
  • Since Protocol No. 11 (1st November 1998), the Court has been single and permanent, and cases can be brought before it directly by an individual (Art. 34).
  • Admissibility: exhaustion of domestic remedies and application within 4 months of the final domestic decision (time limit reduced from 6 to 4 months, applicable since 1st February 2022).
  • ⚠️ The Court is not an appeal court: it can neither annul nor reverse a national judgment.
  • It may award just satisfaction (Art. 41). The execution of its judgments is supervised by the Committee of Ministers.

The distinction is crucial, and constantly misunderstood: winning in Strasbourg does not overturn the French decision. The Court states that the State has violated the Convention; it may order the State to pay compensation; it does not rewrite the judgment.

Bringing a case before it requires having exhausted domestic remedies — in France, up to and including the appeal to the Court of Cassation. It is a narrow door, which opens late, and often years after the events.

The McLibel case ended before it: on 15 February 2005, the Court held that the United Kingdom had violated Article 6 § 1 — because the two defendants, ineligible for legal aid, had had to defend themselves alone against a multinational's lawyers — and Article 10 on freedom of expression.

Sources

External sources.

  1. European Convention on Human Rights (consolidated text) — European Court of Human Rights
  2. ECHR: the time limit for applications falls from 6 to 4 months — Ministry of Justice

Where this comes up in the case file

Other glossary entries — Institutions

← All glossary entries