Collo vs McDo

Legal concepts

The Sherman Act (1890)

The first US antitrust law. It prohibits anti-competitive agreements and monopolisation — and, unlike European competition law, it is also a criminal law.

In brief

  • Adopted on 2 July 1890. The Supreme Court sees it as a “comprehensive charter of economic liberty”.
  • Section 1 (15 U.S.C. § 1): every contract, combination or conspiracy in restraint of trade is illegal. Requires at least two persons.
  • Section 2 (15 U.S.C. § 2): monopolisation and attempted monopolisation — may target a company acting alone.
  • Criminal penalties: up to a $100 million fine for a corporation, $1 million and 10 years' imprisonment for an individual.
  • Treble damages: any victim may claim three times its loss, plus its costs and attorney's fees (Clayton Act, § 4).

Two features radically distinguish the Sherman Act from European competition law. First, its criminal dimension: a cartel can send an executive to prison. Second, the treble damages mechanism, which turns every victim into a private prosecutor and makes economically rational litigation that European law would leave unpursued.

The law does not prohibit every restraint of trade, but only unreasonable restraints — a nuance introduced by the case law as early as 1911. That is the origin of the fundamental distinction between practices that are illegal in themselves and those that must be weighed.

Its application to the labour market is recent and decisive: agreements between employers not to poach each other's employees are now analysed as cartels.

Sources

External sources.

  1. 15 U.S.C. § 1 — Trusts in restraint of trade illegal — Cornell Legal Information Institute
  2. 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Monopolizing trade a felony — Cornell Legal Information Institute
  3. The Antitrust Laws — Federal Trade Commission

Where this comes up in the case file

Other glossary entries — Legal concepts

← All glossary entries