Collo vs McDo

Cassation & ECHR · 6 May 2002

Judgment of the Court of Cassation

The commercial chamber of the Court of Cassation (France's highest court) does not admit the appeal: the appeal judgment becomes final.

Type
Court decision
Court
The Court of Cassation
Date
6 May 2002
Parties
Bernard Collorafi v. McDonald’s France

Summary

Summary sheet

Non-admission judgment — Court of Cassation, commercial chamber · 6 May 2002

Overview: judgment of the Court of Cassation, commercial, financial and economic chamber, ruling on appeal no. X 00-14.487 brought by Bernard Collorafi and the companies Les Pins, Sebol and B et O against the company Mac Donald's France.

Key points

The appeal was directed against two judgments delivered on 9 December 1998 and 8 March 2000 by the Paris Court of Appeal (16th chamber, section A). The case was examined at the public hearing of 12 March 2002, presided over by Mr Dumas, on the report of Mrs Mouillard, conseiller référendaire, with the observations of SCP Bouzidi for the appellants and of SCP Delaporte et Briard for Mac Donald's France. The Court formally notes that Mr Gauthier, liquidator of the companies Les Pins and B et O, has taken over the proceedings. Considering that the grounds relied on are not such as to allow the appeal to be admitted, it declares the appeal non-admitted, orders the appellants to pay the costs and to pay Mac Donald's the sum of 2,250 euros under Article 700 of the new Code of Civil Procedure.

Significance

This decision closes the cassation route and makes final the orders made on appeal, bringing the judicial course of the dispute to an end.

Sheet generated automatically from the transcription of the document.

Download the summary sheet (PDF)

The original scan

Download the original scan (PDF)

Full transcription

Text obtained by optical character recognition (OCR) of the original scan, layout preserved. Automatic recognition — errors remain, especially on degraded faxes. The scan above is authoritative.

COMM. CH.B COURT OF CASSATION Public hearing of 6 May 2002 Non-admission Mr DUMAS, president Appeal no. X 00-14.487 Judgment no. 10131 F FRENCH REPUBLIC IN THE NAME OF THE FRENCH PEOPLE FINANCIERE E COUNOMIQUE, REnON aCHA SURE COMMERCIALE. On the appeal lodged by: 1°) Mr Bernard Collorafi, residing at 21 B, chemin de l'Estelle, 06110 Le Cannet, 2°) the company Les Pins, a limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), whose registered office is at 32, avenue de Cannes, 06160 Juan-les-Pins, 3°) the company Sebol, a public limited company (société anonyme), whose registered office is at the Carrefour shopping centre, chemin de Saint-Claude, 06600 Antibes, 4°) the company B et O, a limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée), whose registered office is at rond-point Weiseller, route de Grasse, 06600 Antibes, against two judgments delivered on 9 December 1998 and 8 March 2000 by the Paris Court of Appeal (16th chamber - section A), in favour of the company Mac Donald's France, whose registered office is at 1, rue Gustave Eiffel, 78041 Guyancourt Cedex France, respondent to the appeal to the Court of Cassation; Having regard to the communication made to the Procureur général; THE COURT, at the public hearing of 12 March 2002, at which were present: Mr Dumas, president, Mrs Mouillard, conseiller référendaire, reporting judge, Mr Métivet, conseiller, Mr Feuillard, avocat général, Mrs Arnoux, chamber registrar; On the report of Mrs Mouillard, conseiller référendaire, the submissions of SCP Bouzidi, counsel for Mr Collorafi and the companies Les Pins, Sebol, B et O, of SCP Delaporte et Briard, counsel for the company Mac Donald's France, the conclusions of Mr Feuillard, avocat général, and after deliberation in accordance with the law; Having regard to article L. 131-6 of the Code of Judicial Organisation; Takes note of the resumption of proceedings by Mr Gauthier, liquidator in the compulsory liquidations of the companies Les Pins and B et O; Whereas the grounds of appeal annexed to this decision, relied on against the contested decision, are not such as to allow the appeal to be admitted; DECLARES the appeal not admitted; Orders the applicants to pay the costs; Having regard to article 700 of the New Code of Civil Procedure, orders them to pay to the company Mac Donald's the sum of 2,250 euros; Thus decided by the Court of Cassation, Commercial, Financial and Economic Chamber, and delivered by the president at its public hearing of six May two thousand and two.

Scroll within the frame to read the full transcription — the complete text remains present on the page.

Other documents — Cassation & ECHR

← All documents in the case file